Buy Low Price From Here Now
Intel Core i7-965 Processor Extreme Edition 3.2 GHz, 6.4 QPI, 45nm, SSE4, 3 Channel Memory, 8 MB L3 Cache, Turbo Boost Technology, EIST in a LGA-1366 package
Readmore
Technical Details
- Intel Core i7-965- 6.4 Intel QuickPath Interconnect
- 3 Channel Memory
- 8MB L3 Cache
- LGA-1366 package
See more technical details
By S. Showalter (Ohio, USA)
Question is, can you get something nearly as good for much less? Indeed, it's possible. But considering that technically you can get the i7 975 for even cheaper (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B002A6LOI4?tag=a52-20&ie=UTF8), that should be enough to make you drool a few more drops of saliva if money is no object.
Contrary to popular belief, CPU chip fabrication is really an imprecise art, and manufacturing perfection cannot be found in this industry. The same series of chips, in this case the i7 900 series, are all manufactured from the same wafer. Whether or not they get the extreme designation and specified number is based on testing done on each chip after the fabrication process is complete. However not every chip is tested for a specific range in the series (e.g. 965/975).
Like any company, Intel has manufacturing quotas, so a certain number of 965s and 975s have to be produced each month, but beyond that, they don't run the harder tests involved with these extreme chips. So in reality, you could technically get a 965 or a 975 in the 950 mix, assuming all quotas were met for any chips above 950 in that particular month of fabrication. The main reason for this is due to the limited demand on the 965s and 975s. In the end, it's more-or-less the luck of the draw.
Technically, this means you could by chance end up with a 920 that matches the quality of a 950 or higher. However, the chances are more likely that you could get a 975-quality from a 950 batch, since both would come from the same vicinity on the wafer (that vicinity being the area that consistently yields the best chips) whereas the 920s are coming from a known lesser-quality area of the wafer. The 920s typically are the bottom of the barrel in the series.
So if you're absolutely picky and you must have top-of-the-line equipment, definitely go with the 975 or one of the other extreme edition CPUs, because you're guaranteed to receive a chip of the highest quality (assuming you can afford it).
However, if price is any concern at all, but absolute top performance is certainly not an issue, go with a 950 (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B002A6G3V2?tag=a52-20&ie=UTF8) and take your chances on getting something better, especially if you're considering overclocking. It really all depends on your cooling solution, settings and the chances of drawing something better than the label suggests, but from what I've seen the chances are actually pretty decent.
I've benchmarked the 975, 965 and 950, all overclocked. The 975 ran only 1.8% faster than the 950, but the 950 ran even better than the "extreme" 965. In the end, I was certainly satisfied with the results of the 950 for the price. For anyone on the fence with price vs performance, you certainly won't be dissatisfied with the 950. Even if you have the extra cash to plop down on the 975, save your money and get an SSD with the extra cash flow. That's where the real bottleneck is in computing these days, and you shouldn't ever run such a top-of-the-line system without having a high-speed hard drive!
For those who are curious, here is what I chose for my machine's final configuration:
Mobo: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001KA9PZK?tag=a52-20&ie=UTF8
CPU: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B002A6G3V2?tag=a52-20&ie=UTF8
Memory: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001VNLDN8?tag=a52-20&ie=UTF8
Hard Drive (SSD): http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B002IGT7IU?tag=a52-20&ie=UTF8
PSU: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001M3G42W?tag=a52-20&ie=UTF8
By Victor M. Mitri (Qatar)
I've been using this processor for some time with WIN 7 64bit, its amazing processor.
This product process any data video / audio in very high speed making any application looks so simple.
I've tested it with Autocad, 3D, Audio / Video Processing and processing time was satisfactory.
If you have the budget go for it, just make sure you have the purchased the right accessories for it.
1- Mother Board, go for 6 / 8 Ram Slots
2-DDR3 RAM
3- HDD 15000 RPM or 10000
4- Processor cooling on gaz, check my previous reviews. the fan that comes with this unit is noise.
I did not try to overclock this processor, in fact there is no reason to do that, games and other serious applicaiton does not consume more than 60% of the processor capabilities.
By Kenneth K. Jackson Jr.
basically the AMD Phenom II X4 955 HDZ955FBGIBOX 3.2 GHz/6 MB L3/125W Processor, but for 4x the price and less stable when overclocked. What's the point again? Price drop from $1079 to $999 was nice but tiny in comparison. AMD wins.
By Dakar (Littleton, CO)
this is a nice fast chip but really not worthwhile at this point. Most applications aren't going to use the chip fully and only a few people who do the intensive rendering etc. will even notice the difference. So for 3x the price, better off spending the extra money on better graphics card, video and storage. I'm glad people are buying it to help subsidize the rest of their chips though.
By Col. Pattarino (USA)
I stand in awe of the awesome power and speed of this perfect processor! My friend was showing off his dual Intel Core i7 965s. The i7 965s had absolutely no problem handeling a quad sli and a 1Tb Hard Drive. Handling overbearing graphics... no problem. Vista, Crysis, and Battlefield Bad Company beware!
Images Product
Buy Intel Core i7 965 3.2GHz 8M L3 Cache 6.4GT/sec QPI Hyper-Threading Turbo Boost LGA1366 Extreme Processor Now
No comments:
Post a Comment